Supreme Court criticizes IMA for “unethical conduct” in the Patanjali advertisement case and orders “house in order.”
Case of the Patanjali advertisements: The court has requested that the licensing authorities of every state and union territory be joined as parties to the action.
The Indian Medical Association (IMA), the petitioner in the case involving misleading marketing against Patanjali Ayurved, Baba Ramdev, and Acharya Balkrishna, was criticized by the Supreme Court of India on Tuesday for its doctors’ purported endorsement of “expensive and unnecessary” allopathic drugs.
The nation’s preeminent medical group was informed by the Supreme Court in scathing remarks that “four fingers” were also pointing at them.
“The allopathic field’s medications are also recommended by your (IMA) physicians. Why don’t we aim the beam at you (IMA) if that’s what’s occurring?” the IMA was questioned by the SC.
In response to accusations of “unethical acts” involving the prescription of “expensive and unnecessary” medications to patients, the Supreme Court ordered IMA to clear its records.
According to ANI, the court stated, “There are multiple complaints regarding alleged unethical conduct of IMA.”
Additionally, the Supreme Court noted that FMCG businesses were misleading the public by running ads for goods that have an impact on the health of elderly people, babies, and school-age children.
The licensing authorities of every state and union territory have been invited to get into the case as parties by the court.
Also read: Patanjali issues a public apology following his rap by the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has ordered government ministries to submit affidavits outlining their response to deceptive marketing throughout the previous three years.
“Right now, we’re examining everything…The court said, “We are dealing with women, children, and babies, and nobody may be taken for granted.
It stated that the Union government needed to realize this.
What is Patanjali’s complaint against?
The Indian Medical Association has filed a lawsuit against Patanjali Ayurved for discrediting modern medicine and releasing ads that purported to be able to treat illnesses.
Following the Supreme Court’s ruling last year, Patanjali provided an assurance that they would stop releasing deceptive advertisements. Nevertheless, the court determined that they had broken their undertaking earlier this year.
See also: SC to Ramdev: Don’t disparage other medical systems; he claims not to be “ignorant.”
Subsequently, the court filed a contempt case against Acharya Balkrishna and Baba Ramdev.
In the contempt proceedings in the misleading marketing case against Patanjali Ayurved Ltd., the top court on April 16 warned Baba Ramdev and Balkrishna against any attempt to “degrade allopathy” and allowed them to submit a “public apology and show contrition” within a week. But it had noted that the two were still in hot water.
The business notified the judge today that it had apologized in more than sixty newspapers.
Baba Ramdev and Patanjali Ayurved MD Acharya Balkrishna were asked by the Supreme Court to transcribe their newspaper apology.
